The differences between The Sandbox and Decentraland Metaverses

There are significant differences between The Sandbox and Decentraland Metaverses.

In this post, we’ll discuss the primary distinctions among Decentraland and The Sandbox, two of the largest Blockchain Metaverses that exist today, thanks to their many capabilities and the large community that is part of these two.

Decentraland’s 90,000 virtual parcels of land (LAND) are evolving into a massive universe of possibilities for creativity. The Sandbox contains more than 166 parcels of virtual land, yet its innovative offerings are more extensive than Decentraland.

Both Metaverses have demonstrated that their commitment to technology is achievable. Their use of Blockchain gives them an advantage over all other Metaverses. Like, for instance, the famous Second Life. What is different between the plans that are offered by Decentraland as well as The Sandbox?

Both aim for a similar experience by giving you the ability to create the avatar you want to construct trading or live unforgettable experiences on their platforms. Both projects take different paths to accomplish the same goals.

Proposals’ Maturity: The fundamental differences between The Sandbox and Decentraland Metaverses

One of the most significant differences between the 2 platforms lies in the amount of duration they’ve been running. While Decentraland is usually portrayed as the original, The Sandbox started as a project in the year 2012. It was a Metaverse that was centralized and did not have Blockchain technology. His premise changed in 2018, which was when he launched Blockchain technology. So, it is possible to claim that The Sandbox has two milestones:

• A project that has more development time and powerful tools for creation.
• First, to demonstrate that integrating Blockchain technology into games that are already in play is feasible.

Decentraland began by establishing an initial Blockchain-based foundation for its Metaverse in 2017. However, the main accomplishment is developing the first Blockchain Metaverse.

Governance

A critical difference between the two projects is the governance. Decentraland is managed by a DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization). Animoca Brands controls the Sandbox; this could change in the future since Sandbox’s plans for the year ahead include activating DAO, perhaps during the 4th quarter of the year.

The governance of both projects will be the same shortly. It is a clear indication of the profound dedication of these Metaverses to collaboration and community.

Access to Games

It is easy to access Decentraland. You need an active web browser and an Ethereum wallet (MetaMask) installed. It means you can play in this world. But, if your system isn’t compatible with the game extension (WebGL, for instance), you’ll be unable to play. Unfortunately, this is the case with older machines or have graphics that aren’t supported.

The Sandbox is also accessible through The Web (browsers) and an installed client (Alpha2). It lets you access The Sandbox to be much more efficient and secure and integrate and use the computer’s resources more efficiently.

Additionally, it is essential to mention that The Sandbox has integration with Ethereum and Polygon, which has been extensively utilized to lower commissions charged for our actions through the network.

Finally, it also allows The Sandbox to have a better user experience (more rapid and responsive) and higher visual quality (using advanced graphics APIs not offered through WebGL).

Events, Personalization, NFTs, and much more

The most significant aspects of both metaverses are their capacity to create NFTs and host events, purchase land, and personalize your avatar and belongings. In this regard, Decentraland is smaller.

In one way, using WebGL in Decentraland restricts the capability for the 3D models it renders and the effects that it can apply.

The limitation does not fall on the fault of the Decentraland developers. Instead, it is the responsibility of the WebGL standards and browsers that it relies on. For example, creating spaces with vast horizons in Decentraland is virtually impossible.

The Sandbox, The Sandbox’s creators, have realized this and developed an installable client that removes this restriction and allows for greater creativity. Another benefit of The Sandbox is the creative system powered by VoxEdit and its character designer and NFT.

VoxEdit is a full 3D Voxel design software that allows you to design characters, animations, and NFTs that can be integrated into The Sandbox’s world. Unfortunately, the Sandbox is something that Decentraland is not equipped with.

Scalability

The Sandbox is the absolute king of scaling. The integration of Polygon allows it to be thousands of times more efficient and more affordable than Decentraland, which is based on using its own Ethereum network. A clear distinction, one that we believe Decentraland can resolve shortly.

Collaborations and Supports

Decentraland counts corporations like Atari, Cyberpunk, Polygon, Blender, and Samsung in support of corporate clients.

Whereas, the Sandbox has formed agreements that include Atari, OpenSea, CryptoKitties, The Walking Dead, Snoop Dogg, Avenged Sevenfold, Adidas, The Smurfs, Hell’s Kitchen, and numerous others.

SoftBank also supports the Sandbox; a Japanese multinational corporation focused on investment management. In the same way, Animoca is one of the most renowned video game studios around the globe.

Conclusions

Decentraland and The Sandbox are two Metaverse projects that offer fantastic ideas in the coming years despite their different approaches.

Furthermore, both have large communities and unstoppable progress, driven by their popularity and acceptance in the crypto community.